I’m proposing internally
I want to make the case internally without rewriting it myself.
Typical roles
Compliance lead, AI governance lead, risk manager
AI Risk-Tiering Screen
Pinpoint what needs attention.
Uncover which of your AI systems may survive regulatory scrutiny, and which may not.
Client shortcuts
What is your role?
Get the message
I approve the spending
I need to check the cost, time and result without reading the whole page.
Typical roles
CFO, CRO, accountable executive, board sponsor
I check the boundaries
I want to confirm what Strathwill will access, what the screen covers and where it stops.
Typical roles
Legal counsel, procurement lead, privacy lead, security lead
I will complete the questionnaire
I want to know what information to prepare and whether I need technical help.
Typical roles
Product manager, system owner, operations lead, engineering lead
The problem
Systems need an inventory.
You need a priority list.
A spreadsheet can tell you which systems exist. It cannot tell you which one needs action first, why it matters or what evidence is missing.
We screen every system on the same basis and place it on one of three paths:
You leave with one shared order of work, not a separate list of worries for every system.
Position: Keep under review
Customer-support assistant
The information reviewed does not show an immediate compliance action within this screen’s scope.
Next review trigger
Re-screen if the system starts influencing customer decisions, uses new data, enters a new market or changes its level of automation.
Page 3/3
Position: Act now
Customer-facing recommendation tool
The information reviewed suggests an immediate compliance action is needed within this screen’s scope.
Next action trigger
Start remediation before the system influences customer decisions, expands its data use or enters a new market.
Page 1/3
Position: Assess further
Internal decision-support system
The current information is incomplete. Further assessment is needed before a compliance path can be confirmed.
Next review trigger
Re-screen when the system’s data sources, users, outputs or level of automation are confirmed.
Page 2/3
What you receive
Four questions answered,
One report generated.
Likely risk tier
Where the system appears to sit based on the information supplied.
What drives the judgement
The use, people affected, level of automation and other facts that matter.
What is missing
The evidence, controls or unanswered questions preventing a stronger position.
What should you do next
The action, owner or specialist input needed to move the system forward.
How it works
Tell us what each system does.
We do the sorting.
1
Complete the questionnaire
Tell us what your system does, who it affects, where it is used and what controls exist. No engineering knowledge needed.
2
Join one clarification
We use 45 minutes to check assumptions, fill important gaps and confirm the systems in scope.
3
Receive the report
We apply the same questions, explain each view and set out the next actions in priority order.
Scope
Here, you see the full stop.
The screen has a defined job: identify the likely regulatory risk position of the AI systems in scope and show what needs to happen next.
What we do and do not cover.
The screen covers
Systems: Up to five named AI systems- Input: Questionnaire and clarification-call review
- Assessment: A reasoned screening view for each system
- Findings: Material gaps visible from the information supplied
- Output: One written report with prioritised next actions
The screen does not cover
Legal: Legal advice or legal representation- Formal assurance: Certification, statutory audit, assurance or an audit opinion
- Privacy: A Data Protection Impact Assessment
- Commercial: Contract or procurement review
- Technical testing: Penetration, model-performance or source-code testing
- Independent verification: Verification of information not supplied during the screen
Price & timing
One fixed payment,
to start the deep dive.
£800 for up to five AI systems.
Report in three working days.
*Payment is made before work begins. The delivery clock starts after we accept the completed questionnaire and confirm the systems in scope.
*Tax treatment confirmed before payment.
Content
| Structured questionnaire | Included |
| Clarification call | 45 minutes |
| Individual system findings | Included |
| Cross-system summary | Included |
| Direct system access | Not required |
Delivery
Three working days after complete intake is accepted
Engagement fee
| Up to five AI systems | £800 |
| Additional systems | Scope and price reviewed separately |
Forwarding this service
Not the person who
makes the decision?
Share this internally.
FAQ
Questions people ask.
Do you need access to our systems or data?
No direct access. The screen uses your questionnaire answers and one clarification call. Nothing is installed or connected.
Who should fill in the questionnaire?
The person who knows what the system does, why it is used and who it affects. They can bring in an engineer, lawyer, privacy lead or security owner for questions that need specialist input.
What if you cannot reach a view?
We state what is missing, why it matters and what evidence or specialist input is needed before your organisation can decide.
What if a system needs deeper assessment?
The report explains why and what the next assessment should resolve. Any further work is optional and separately scoped.
What if a system may involve a prohibited practice?
The report does not fold that finding into an ordinary action list. It flags the possible prohibited practice separately, explains the information supporting the flag and states that the system needs immediate legal or specialist review before the organisation decides whether it can continue.
Will this delay a launch?
The report gives your organisation a first position and a short list of next actions. Whether a launch changes depends on the findings, the evidence available and your approval process.
Is this legal advice or certification?
No. The service does not provide legal advice, certification or an audit opinion. Where a question needs legal advice or authorised assurance, the report identifies it and stops there.
Put your AI systems in priority order.
Tell us which systems you want to screen. We will confirm the scope, the information needed and when the work can start.